欧洲各国正就酒类监管新规展开激烈交锋 European countries are battling over rules on booze

The World Cup was a bright moment both for Spain and for its drinks sales. On match days, profits in the country’s bars were 25-30% higher than average. But despite the sunny, beery terraces, a storm was brewing for Spain’s booze industry—and Europe’s. Sales of beer and wine have been sliding for years. Now some countries want to tighten regulations on alcohol.
世界杯不仅是西班牙足球的荣耀时刻,也是其酒类销售的高光时刻。在比赛日,该国酒吧的利润普遍比平时高出25-30%。然而,尽管阳光明媚的露台上洋溢着啤酒的麦香,一场风暴却正在西班牙乃至整个欧洲的酒类行业上空酝酿。多年来,啤酒和葡萄酒的销量一直呈下滑趋势。如今,一些国家正打算进一步收紧对酒类的监管。
In March Belgium told the European Commission it wanted to pass laws that prohibit advertising alcohol to minors. It also wants a blunter mandatory warning on advertising, stating that “alcohol is harmful to health.” (The current one states merely that “alcohol abuse harms your health.”) Wine-producing countries, including France, Italy, Romania and Slovakia, have filed objections. They say the Belgian laws would fragment the advertising market and erect barriers to foreign firms.
今年3月,比利时向欧盟委员会通报,计划通过立法禁止向未成年人投放酒类广告。此外,它还要求在广告上强制添加更为直白的警告标语:“饮酒有害健康。”(而目前的标语仅仅是“滥用酒精有害健康”。)法国、意大利、罗马尼亚和斯洛伐克等葡萄酒生产国对此提出了强烈抗议。他们声称,比利时的这项法律将导致广告市场碎片化,并为外国企业设置人为的贸易壁垒。
The provision causing the most alarm is the statement that alcohol inevitably causes harm. Brewers and vintners fear that shadowy public-health forces plan to do to booze what they did to tobacco: stigmatise it as poisonous and socially undesirable. Adding to the tension are cultural issues. In warm, relaxed Mediterranean countries, such as Italy, Portugal and France, alcoholic beverages are enjoyed with a meal or sipped on a terrace. The cold “vodka belt” countries, including the Baltics and Nordics, have long had cultures of heavy drinking of hard liquor, and government policies to discourage it.
最让这些国家感到警惕的,是那种宣称酒精必然导致伤害的论调。啤酒酿造商和葡萄种植者们担心,那些在暗中推动公共卫生的力量,正企图对酒类行业故技重施,就像他们当年对付烟草那样:将其污名化为有毒物质,并将其斥为一种不良的社会风气。此外,文化差异也进一步加剧了这种紧张局势。在气候温暖、生活悠闲的意大利、葡萄牙和法国等地中海国家,人们习惯在就餐时搭配酒饮,或在露台上惬意地小酌。而在包括波罗的海国家和北欧诸国在内的寒冷“伏特加地带”,长期以来都有着狂饮烈酒的文化传统;为此,这些国家的政府也一直出台相关政策来遏制这种酗酒行为。
Members of the European Parliament have pushed for continent-wide legislation to mandate warnings and ingredient lists on bottles. But Aurelijus Veryga, a Lithuanian MEP and former health minister, thinks cultural divisions make a tobacco-style agreement on alcohol unlikely. The commission has been promising booze regulation for years, but never seems to deliver. Deadlines for health warnings on alcohol set in its cancer plan of 2021 have gone unmet.
欧洲议会的一些议员一直在推动一项全欧范围内的立法,强制要求在酒瓶上标注健康警告和成分列表。但立陶宛籍欧洲议会议员、前卫生部长奥雷利尤斯·韦里加(Aurelijus Veryga)认为,根深蒂固的文化分歧使得欧洲不太可能在酒类问题上达成像管控烟草那样的一致协议。欧盟委员会多年来一直承诺要出台酒类监管法规,但似乎总是不了了之。其在2021年癌症防治计划中设定的针对酒类添加健康警告的最后期限,至今也未能兑现。
The diplomatic risks of regulating alcohol are clear. In 2018 Ireland became the first European Union member to mandate that bottles carry cancer warnings, a pregnancy warning and calorie and energy information. Italy responded by calling this an “attack” on Italian identity, heritage and the Mediterranean diet, and insisted that wine was a factor in well-being. It rallied other wine-producing nations, including France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, to object too. The Irish restrictions became law nonetheless, but America then complained that the rules constituted a trade barrier. The deployment of warning labels was subsequently deferred until 2028 (due to “economic circumstances”).
对酒类进行监管所面临的外交风险显而易见。2018年,爱尔兰成为首个强制要求在酒瓶上标注致癌警告、孕妇警告以及热量和能量信息的欧盟成员国。意大利随即予以猛烈回击,称此举是对意大利国民身份认同、文化遗产和地中海饮食的“公然攻击”,并坚称适量饮用葡萄酒对健康大有裨益。意大利还拉拢了法国、希腊、葡萄牙和西班牙等其他葡萄酒生产国共同提出抗议。尽管爱尔兰的限制性规定最终还是成为正式法律,但美国随后也加入了抱怨的行列,指责这些规定构成了贸易壁垒。最终(受制于“经济状况的考量”),爱尔兰不得不将警告标签的全面实施推迟到了2028年。
Countries that want to regulate alcohol might look to Lithuania. As health minister, Dr Veryga succeeded in passing wide-ranging restrictions, including a near-total ban on advertising and restricted hours for retail liquor sales. But he says this was only possible thanks to public demand after a series of horrendous incidents, including a drink-driving accident in which three children were killed by an off-duty policeman. “If society is not on your side, you have already lost,” he says, over a glass of alcohol-free beer.
那些想要对酒类痛下杀手的国家,或许可以向立陶宛取取经。在担任卫生部长期间,韦里加博士成功推行了一系列大范围的限制措施,包括几乎全面禁止酒类广告,以及限制零售酒类的销售时间。但他坦言,这一壮举之所以能够实现,完全是因为一系列骇人听闻的恶性事件(包括一起下班警察酒驾撞死三名儿童的惨剧)彻底激怒了公众,从而形成了强大的民意基础。“如果社会舆论不站在你这边,你还没开始就已经输了,”他喝着一杯无醇啤酒,语重心长地说。
In Belgium, the efforts are driven by Frank Vandenbroucke, the health minister, who has struggled to gain broad political support. He has the backing of public-health charities, which are concerned by growing evidence of alcohol’s harms, particularly in raising the likelihood of cancer. Rebecka Öberg of Movendi, a group that promotes alcohol- and drug-free lifestyles, says her organisation wants people to make educated decisions about drinking. That requires better labelling.
在比利时,推动这项监管改革的是卫生部长弗兰克·范登布鲁克(Frank Vandenbroucke);目前他正苦于难以获得广泛的政治支持。不过,他得到了公共卫生慈善机构的力挺。这些机构对越来越多有关酒精危害(尤其是增加患癌风险)的证据深感忧虑。致力于倡导无酒精、无毒品生活方式的组织“Movendi”的丽贝卡·厄贝里(Rebecka Öberg)表示,她们的组织希望人们能在充分了解相关知识的前提下,对是否饮酒做出理性的决定。而这就需要更加完善清晰的标签说明。
With regard to cancer, it is technically correct to say that there is “no safe level” of alcohol consumption. But there remains debate over the point at which the risk becomes meaningful. The incremental risks of drinking a few glasses of wine or beer a week, rather than none at all, might be so low as to render a warning that “alcohol is harmful to health” disproportionate. Europeans routinely engage in other behaviours that carry a non-zero cumulative risk of developing cancer, such as sunbathing, eating bacon and drinking coffee heated to more than 65°C.
就癌症而言,从技术层面上讲,“任何剂量的酒精摄入都是不安全的”这种说法确实是正确的。但争议的焦点在于:这种风险要累积到什么程度才会变得真正具有实质性意义。相比于滴酒不沾,每周喝上几杯葡萄酒或啤酒所增加的风险可能微乎其微;这就使得强制标注“饮酒有害健康”的警告显得有些小题大做了。毕竟,欧洲人日常还会进行许多其他行为,这些行为同样存在微小却会不断累积的致癌风险,比如享受日光浴、大啖培根,以及饮用温度超过65°C的滚烫咖啡。
The irony of Mr Vandenbroucke’s efforts is that Belgian alcohol consumption is falling anyway. Among members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a club of mostly rich countries, Belgium is one of the two countries whose consumption has decreased the most in the past decade. Lithuania, with its recently tightened laws, is the other. Indeed, the populations of most high-income countries are moderating their drinking habits, in part due to health concerns. The decline in beer consumption is especially sharp: it has slumped by 9.2% in the EU since 2019.
对于范登布鲁克先生的努力,最具讽刺意味的是:不管他是否出手,比利时的酒精消费量本身就在一路下滑。在由主要富裕国家组成的经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国中,过去十年来酒精消费量降幅最大的两个国家,一个是比利时,另一个正是刚刚收紧了酒类法律的立陶宛。事实上,大多数高收入国家的人群都在主动节制自己的饮酒习惯,部分原因就是出于对健康的考量。啤酒消费量的降幅尤为惊人:自2019年以来,欧盟的啤酒销量已暴跌了9.2%。
But in economic terms, every crisis is also an opportunity. Today nearly one of every 12 beers drunk across the EU is alcohol-free. The rise of 0.0% brew means that, no matter which side of the alcohol debate you sit on, you have something with which to toast.
但从经济角度来看,每一次危机往往也孕育着新的商机。如今,在整个欧盟消费的啤酒中,几乎每12杯里就有一杯是无醇啤酒。这种“0.0%酒精”饮品的崛起意味着,无论你在这场关于酒精的辩论中站在哪一边,你总能找到一杯合适的饮品来举杯相庆。